The older I get the less I can stand to see the insults we heap upon our planet and its animal life. Yes – I do worry about the humans as well, but something compels me more acutely about plants and animals. It is something more, I am certain, than mere sentimentality. Aging people often stand accused of mawkishness, but I think the truth is exactly the opposite. Life and time tend to wring all the worst aspects of sentimentality from a person, leaving an astonishing acuity of vision and a lack of saccharine attachment. I fear nothing, in many ways. I can look at almost anything. But I find the images and accounts that rattle me most profoundly often concern the earth and its creatures.
For the past three weeks, I have been tracking the stories out of Japan concerning the tsunami and earthquake. The prefecture of Fukushima, with its six nuclear reactors at the Daiichi plant, now all deemed to be in massively unstable condition (yes, even reactors 5 and 6, for you fellow followers of events, are now considered to be far from worry-free), has a fierce hold upon my imagination.
It is true what many have said: there is something about radiation that is so embedded in our consciousness, post-Hiroshima/Nagasaki, and now post-Chernobyl, that it can envelope us like a malignant spirit from a dream. Like radiation itself, the mere idea of radiation – invisible, pervasive, capable of altering us at the cellular level until our own bodies become traitors against us – can cover us like netting, altering our perception of the world.
I’m reading as much as I can – a tactic to which I resort at every critical and potentially overwhelming juncture in life. In the event of serious family illness, for example, I scramble my intellect like an Air Force fighter jet to medical texts and web sites, reading peer reviewed journal articles. Much of it doesn’t even stick, or is utterly opaque, but something about the attempt to gather as much information as I can serves to calm me.
Nuclear physics, God knows, is even farther out of my range than oncology or general medicine, but I’ve read many assessments of the situation. To be sure, any reassurance I feel occurs only because I’m distracted by the feeling of learning things – the assessments themselves are, increasingly, dismal. Many professionals who initially attempted to calm laypersons lurking on physics web sites have given up the attempt. Many others have had to admit, especially in recent days, their initial predictions were far too sunny. Fierce pro-nuclear advocates have faded almost entirely from view.
For myself, I never embraced nuclear power, but never worried very much about it, either. It was just there, overseen by branches of physics and engineering, governmental regulatory bodies, and of course commerce. I hoped, I suppose, that enough balancing was occurring between all those interests to keep things in good order. One does not consider a 9.0 earthquake and a 30-foot tsunami as a reasonable standard for the baseline endurance of massive structures – even nuclear facilities, with their capacity for awful consequences when compromised. Who would have thought such a thing could occur? Yet here we are.
Today, the New York Times revealed the contents of a confidential Nuclear Regulatory Commission assessment of the Daiichi plant. It is filled with mention of potential crises looming there. The situation is essentially that so many points of risk exist that each idea for a cure or soothing of one crisis point can actually precipitate another. Any good outcomes depend on six devastated structures holding whatever shape they still have despite the stress of being refilled with tons of water, injected with hydrogen, and hit by ongoing aftershocks. Today, April 6, 2011, six quakes are shown on the www.usgs.gov site near or off the east cost of Honshu, Japan – as high as a magnitude 5.4. Yesterday there were eight. One does not have to be an anti-nuclear zealot to believe that any stability that may be created there is of necessity hanging by a slim thread indeed.
But I spoke of animals and plants here initially, not physics or seismology. Today, I read the story of a cattle farmer from Fukushima prefecture. Hiroaki Hiruta has been returning to feed his cows since the mandatory evacuation of his town. He is guilty about this, telling AFP reporter Kimiko de Freytas-Tamura the following:
“These cows are like family. I owe my life to them. I know I shouldn’t be doing this, but I can’t accept this situation.” He goes on to tell a story that strikes at the heart.
“When I enter the shed the cows start mooing,” Huruta says. “At times they sound like cries for help, at others as if they were saying how much they had waited for me. You have to hear them to understand,” he added.
“Before I leave them for the day I tell myself that this may be the last time I see them alive, and I take my cap off and bow. I think the cows understand me. Once, they all fell silent as I bowed. It was very strange.”
Despite all my readings about isotopes, engineering materials that may serve as shields between hydrogen and a myriad of possible combustion scenarios, radiation charts, and more, it is this story of Hiroaki Hiruta that moves me most deeply. He has lost something no nuclear plant engineering schema can account for in its calculus of stress and catastrophe. It is the loss of something so fundamental, ancient, and even mythic I am in awe pondering it. Hiruta is losing his attachment to his land, his piece of earth, and the animals he has sustained there with his family for generations – animals which have in turn sustained him and his family. The interplay between human and animal life on earth is so crucial that its destruction is every bit as much of a calamity as a plume of radiation moving across an ocean. The loss of one, and the advent of the other, is cause enough for great grief without any intrusion at all from sentimentality.